Plessis

Tweets about a recent trend: Plessis

RT @malindandesigns: Sondag 25 Februarie kuier @Jay_du_Plessis by Dozi’s Back to the Roots. Bring die hele gesin saam en kom kuier saam!… https://t.co/9CWCjDHCW2
RT @malindandesigns: Sondag 25 Februarie kuier @Jay_du_Plessis by Dozi’s Back to the Roots. Bring die hele gesin saam en kom kuier saam!… https://t.co/9CWCjDHCW2
The Court held that the deceased undertook to support Du Plessis with the intention of being legally bound by such undertaking.
They had been in a stable relationship for 11 years and the deceased had undertaken a contractual  duty to support Du Plessis.
Les carrefours du Plessis et du Bois-Planté sécurisés pour l'été 2018 https://t.co/TzSYfi6pIZ #Angers #AngersOnline #Angers
FACTS Du Plessis & the deceased had been same sex  partners in a permanent life relationship that was  similar in other respects to marriage
Du Plessis did not request extending the common law definition of marriage, the union be between a man & a woman, to persons of the same sex
Du Plessis submitted that the common law action for  damages for loss of support should be developed  to include partners in same sex union.
RT @amaz1ngnature: This is how real men shoot animals by Chris du Plessis This picture deserves endless Shares (y) https://t.co/I9YWjlOGSL
Cricket-Du Plessis back in training ahead of Australia test series CAPE TOWN, Feb 20 (Reuters) - South Africa capta… https://t.co/b8p9oLGAkJ
Du Plessis and Albert Clack ("the deceased")  were partners in a same sex union when the  deceased was killed in a motor vehicle accident.
Sondag 25 Februarie kuier @Jay_du_Plessis by Dozi’s Back to the Roots. Bring die hele gesin saam en kom kuier saam!… https://t.co/9CWCjDHCW2
#503 Du Plessis v Road Accident Fund 2003 (11)  BCLR 1220 (SCA) Supreme Court Appeal 19 September 2003